On Culture and Socialization

I chose these articles and chose to usance it in an example of culture and socialisation between males and females (gender) and discuss much than in the following paragraph. The research I use, strongly suggests that there atomic number 18 heretofore and will ceaselessly be gender-specific confabulation traits. In my experience, a major requisite for sound intercommunication is making sure the receiver understands the subject sent. Effective communication is non so much that I get by a message -verbal or signed - hardly that the person I am communicating with gets the message and responds.If not, miscommunication and misunderstandings whitethorn result. An example is when my husband and I demand a disagreework forcet over close tothing. It surprises me how this can come from pop out of nowhere. new(prenominal) prime example of an underlying cause of miscommunication is obviously due to the whatsoever(prenominal) diverse communication ways, content and method of interpretation of males and females. The interest in and importance of this topic solely, can be found not sole(prenominal) in scholarly journals and books, except also in bestsellers.I permit the book by Deborah Tannen, You Just Dont Understand Wo hands and hands in Conversation, which is champion of the main reasons I chose the two articles, especially the self- maintenance in converse (including not undecomposed the control category, but achieve custodyt, opposition, attribution, anger, denial, withdrawal, and prevarication). I do mean I curb experienced all of these topics in my marriage, let simply other inter in-person communications.For example, if my husband and I argon in an argu workforcet, I know Im right, no, really, because Ive dvirtuoso the research to that extent he electrostatic insists on telling me Im wrong. My rent boils, maybe he knows this. Regardless, I need to work on my take the field vs. flight methodology. He is not right, period. I belittle him in my sound judg workforcet for not knowing what I believe everyone would know. My behavior is al nigh mystical at fourth dimensions c at a timerning my desire to control, my level of anger in a belligerent way, and my actual denial in questioning myself to the highest degree marrying an idiot.I dont know how some times I ache said something to the tune of, look, this is just not going to work out, blah, blah, blah, you should echo about looking for somewhere else to live (knowing this will never proceed in my level of commitment). Relationship therapist John color ins 1992 bestselling book men are from Mars, Women are from Venus explains the difference in communication styles of men and women by humorously suggesting that they are from polar planets, and that these differences contribute to communication conflicts.Gray puts forward that men and women often appear to be turn toing just unalike languages, as yet when the vocabulary, syntax, and grammar they use ar e the same. Deborah Tannen, whose book, You Just Dont Understand Women and manpower in Conversation, was on the New York Times Best Seller tip for nearly four years and brought gender differences in communication style to the general public. Tannen contends that differences between the communication styles of women and men are the result of to a greater extent than culture and culture, but are intrinsic in the basic answer up of each gender. Tannen, 1990) Taking a more scholarly perspective, Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz contends that among other things, the field of communication includes the study of meaning, the study of how people convey ideas for themselves and to one another (Leeds-Hurwitz, p. xv). Saying the same thing may have divergent meanings for men and for women. (Tannen, 1990) argues that men and women have dissimilar styles of conversing, of listening, of talking, and make up have different purposes at stake in most conversations.She concludes that these different styl es mother different meanings of the same words, and come about to miscommunication. In the three preceding paragraphs, I conditioned something I never knew. timber stated Researching communications between men and women reveals that the rules taught through childhood play are evident in vainglorious interaction (Wood, J. , 2004, p. 117). She makes the point, however, that not all women follow rules of feminine communication communities and not all men follow rules of masculine ones (Wood, J. 2004).Tannen contends, differences between the communication styles of women and men are the result of more than culture and socialization, but are inherent in the basic make up of each gender (Tannen, 1990). I never knew that, but I personally dont presuppose there is enough evidence, nor do I agree. I trust just because a child king see his parents arguing the majority of the time and eventually divorcing after staying together for the sake of the children its not always true about rule s universe taught in childhood play being evident in adult interaction.I think this statement might just need more research on the age of the child, if by rules she is referring to interpersonal communication, etc. I know many now adults who have been through a curing of negative interactions between their parents (arguing, fighting, and yelling at each other) while growing up to include general poster of adult conversation(s). These individuals have become excellent communicators, and have even master an ability to successfully teach interpersonal communications. The majority have also been in persistent-term what appears to be a successful marriage or blood.I researched further in my book (next paragraph) to find out Tannen has some of the same thoughts as Wood on children being socially mould and trained to speak separate languages based on their gender. Because I used a published book and a scholarly article, and because of the information I learned, I have gained a motive to dig deeper into researching their theories and/or ideologies. twain Wood and Tannen agree socialization in different gender communities accounts for some special K misunderstandings between women and men (Wood, 2004, p. 118).Tannen contends that men and women speak differently in face-to-face conversation because children are socially m honest-to- goodnessed and trained to speak separate languages based on their gender. They both offer examples regarding how males and females discuss problems. When a woman tells a man about something that is troubling her, he responds by offering advice or a solution. On the other hand, women ken communication as a way to build connections and are looking for empathy and banter of receiveings prior to advice. According to Wood the most common complication in gender communication occurs when a woman says Lets talk about us.To many men this often means trouble because they interpret the request as implying there is a problem in a descent (Wo od, 2004, p. 118) and men are socialized to regard talking about a relationship useful only if there is a problem to be solved. Wood contends, however, that women feel problems are not the only reason to talk about a relationship. Women use talking to build intimacy. Tannen (1990, 1993) points out that both men and women need to understand the basic differences in their communication styles to find common ground and understanding.In spite of any genetic, biological or socialization factors that lead to ineffective communication between men and women (specifically my husband and I), effective interpersonal communication can be learned. I think once an understanding is reached, through patience and time, we (my husband and I) tend to accept and as inept as it sounds, positively tolerate the opposite genders communications, and have more meaningful exchange of information, ideas and feelings in our personal communication. Ive found different meanings in his actions whether verbal or no n-verbal.We now agree to disagree and long ago came to understand what we once misunderstood in our interpersonal communication. At one point, when Tannen concluded that the different styles (genetic, biological or socialization factors) produce different meanings of the same words, and lead to miscommunication I immediately thought of how these different meanings of the same words, etc. , in an interpersonal conversation could lead to a conversation of misunderstanding without the participants even knowing. As stated in bridge over not Walls, Editor John Stewart, the statement I want to be me, but I need you (confirmed by Stewart J. 2009, p. 95), made me seriously think about my true need to be both intrapersonal and interpersonal. So, from here, I feel I need to maintain a sort of parallel hint in working on culture and socialization, but not only verbally. I think when people think of interpersonal communication, they dont consider nonverbal communication which can also lead to misunderstandings, or different interpretations of the same set of facts, causing breakdowns in communication. Television and magazine advertisements, as well as media portrayals of men and women, often perpetuate stereotypes.Men are macho and women are happy housewives or submissive playthings. It is authorised for effective communication not to make assumptions. On culture and socialization I cringe at the fact that physical appearance is the most obvious nonverbal cue we present it prompts others to perceive us with legitimate expected personality traits. It is a huge part of culture and socialization. In previous sociology experiments Ive done, i. e. , I went into a grocery store and purchased a few items. I had just gotten out of bed a couplet of hours earlier no matter whom I had said anything to one out of five people would respond.Even the cashier and bagboy were kind of stand offish. bingle day later, I returned, dressed in my work apparel which consisted of a suit, s hort heels, minimal make-up and hair fixed. It was like a one-hundred lxxx degree flip. Random people were friendly, a smile here and there, and even a conversation with the same cashier. They might not have even recognized me from the day before, but I learned a lot about nonverbal communication and how it too, plays a tremendous role in culture and any type of socialization.In an experiment conducted by Schellenberg (1993) reports that severe looking subjects were rated more highly than less attractive ones on non-physical traits as well. More attractive persons were also comprehend as being more socially sensitive, sexually warm, kind, poised, and interesting than less attractive persons. In sum, they were perceived as having all the more desirable traits. Not only were they rated high on the personality dimensions, but they were seen as happier and more successful in their lives (p. 129). Old School-Research on nonverbal communication must be approached cautiously. near stud ies mark masculinity and femininity as stable, individual traits, when current research has placed us in a better position from which to view masculine and feminine display as operating in the service of process of impression management and social maintenance (Epstein, 1988, p. 220). I say old school for the research conducted by Epstein in 1988, yet it amazingly still applies research done today on nonverbal communication and gender. Generally, the sexes are attracted to one another on the basis of what Walster and her colleagues called the interconnected hypothesis ( Knapp, 1989, p. 59). The matching hypothesis argues that we may be attracted to only the best looking partners, but we will accept someone at least as good looking as we are. In other words, we are realistic in our approach to matching ourselves with prospective partners. I know it is true, but it still makes me cringe. It is judgment and judgment is up to God, not us. Conclusion On refining and Socialization and S elf-Maintenance in Communication bettering verbal and nonverbal performance may not change any societal hierarchies, social orders, interpersonal communications, but it may be a first step.Studies have shown that the ability to right interpret verbal and nonverbal communications leads to more successful personal relationships. Greater awareness of verbal and nonverbal communication skills may lead to enhanced assertiveness. Being aware of the relationships between power and verbal/nonverbal communications changes the way people view seemingly neutral interactions. The relationship among power, sex, and verbal/nonverbal communications is one that has not been studied sufficiently. unless study of this controversial subject can only help to advance interpersonal communications.