Briefing The Case

TITLELeegin Creative Leather Products , Inc v . PSKS , IncFACTS requester Leegin Creative Leather Products , a manufacturer of women s accessories under the brand name Brighton , entered into a trusty minimum worth agreements with its retailer , which includes herein respondent , PSKS , Inc . wooer avers that such cost agreements intend to encourage com request among retailers in the areas of customer service and product promotion . However , herein respondent discounted Leegin products below their prescribed minimum price . after being dropped by Leegin as one of its retailers , PSKS d a lawsuit , arguing that Leegin violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act by engaging in anticompetitive price fixing . The District administration decided in favor of PSKS citing Dr . Miles Medical Co . v . John D . Park Sons Co , which held t hat mandate price agreements are per se illegal under the Sherman Act . supplicant , in an appeal to the U .S .

Court of Appeals for the Fifth lap , argued that this blueprint was based on outdated economics and contended that a the rule of reason is a better legal psychoanalysis Petitioner further claimed that price minimums will only be held illegal when proven to be anticompetitive . The appellate court rule in favor of the district court hence , this quest for certiorariISSUEIs it per se illegal for a manufacturer to treated compulsory minimum prices for its productsRULENo , it is not illegal for a ma nufacturer to get along mandatory minimum p! rices for its products . Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits [e]very put under , combination in...If you want to get a full essay, secure it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper