Financial Analysis: PepsiCo Beats Coca-Cola Essay -- Pepsi, Coke, busi

Pepsi vs. hundred the epic battle that every American and from the have a bun in the ovens of their fiscal didacticss possibly everyone in the world must deal with does it have a winner. For the fiscal social class 2005 it certainly does through analyzing financial statements with vertical, horizontal, and ratio analysis investors are fitted to clearly decide who the better choice for their investment is. By watchful scruitiny and attention to detail any investor can safely put their notes in a buiseness as an investment so long as they are adhering to rules and regulations of the GAAP. Using the tools for financial analysis and the information given I will determine the winner of that battle for 2005 at least from the investors load of view. In our literature it states that a vertical analysis evaluates financial statement data by expressing each item in a financial statement as a percent of a base amount. I chose to look vertically at reliable assets and liabilitie s, of both companies so I can compare these figures between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to find out who is in better reliable standing. Current assets Vs. Total Assets for PepsiCo( 2005)10454/ 31727 = approx. 33% of total assets are ongoing (2004)8639/ 27987 = approx. 31% of total assets are currentNow we will look at the current liabilities vs. total liabilities for PepsiCo(2005)9406/ 17476 = approx. 54% of the total liabilities are current (2004)6752/ 14464 = approx. 47% of the total liabilities are current Current assets Vs. Total Assets for Coca-Cola2005)10250/ 29427 =Approx. 35% Current2004)12281/ 31441 = Approx 39% CurrentAnd we will look at the current liabilities vs. total liabilities for Coca-Cola2005)9836/ 29427 = Approx. 33% Current 2004... ...id volume growth for 2005The company utter it earned $864 million, or 36 cents a share, in the fourth quarter, a 28 percent drop from the stratum before. However, excluding one-time charges, the company earned 46 cents per share, a penny ahead of analysts expectations. One-time items included taxes on repatriated foreign win and a charge related to a bottling investment.(Wilbert, 06) It is a sad daylight when you have a 28% drop year over year and exceed Wall Street expectations. If I were in their shoes I would do whatever I had to do to entice consumers to put their unsaid earned cash back in my company even at the cost lower profitability dole out for less but sell morehey it works for Wal-Mart why not you to Coca-Cola. Until they change their investment and selling strategies I would steer clear of investing in any invigorated Coca-Cola stock for more than a few years.